FaserF / TCL-Discussion-Telegram
javascriptmain30bad643.1K linessynced 14h ago
Code health
9.5out of 10Excellent
This codebase scores 9.5 out of 10 on defect risk, which we rate excellent. It also scores maintainability 9.6 and static performance risk 10.0 out of 10. The three are scored separately and never blended into one number.
- Lines of code
- 3.1K
Recent activity
All commitsCommits
No commits indexed yet.
Decisions
No decisions extracted yet.
Needs attention
14 open- medium severity. Knowledge silodocs/javascripts/auth.js100% single-owner concentration
- medium severity. Knowledge silodocs/javascripts/banner.js100% single-owner concentration
- medium severity. Knowledge silodocs/javascripts/hash-navigation.js100% single-owner concentration
- medium severity. Knowledge silodocs/javascripts/telegram-widgets.js100% single-owner concentration
- medium severity. Knowledge siloeslint.config.js100% single-owner concentration
Composition
Open the graphjavascript 36%markdown 29%yaml 21%json 9%python 4%Other 2%
Explore this codebase
- Docs25 pages across 4 modules
- ChatAsk this codebase a question and get an answer with its sources
- Files56 files with per-file docs, health and history
- ArchitectureDependency graph, layers, and 6 entry points
- Code healthPer-file scores, 24 open findings, coverage and refactoring targets
- Knowledge graphEntities, communities, and the paths between them
- Change couplingFiles that keep changing together, mined from commit history
- CommitsChange-risk ranked history with agent provenance
- ContributorsBus factor, per-file maintainers, and the human/agent split
- StatsSize class, origin, lifetime churn, rhythm and records
- CostsWhat indexing this snapshot cost, by model and by run