faserf/ha-rewe

FaserF / ha-rewe

pythonmaind31d0465.9K linessynced 1mo ago

Code health

5.2out of 10Needs work

This codebase scores 5.2 out of 10 for code health, which we rate needs work. It also scores maintainability 7.7 and static performance 9.7 out of 10. The three are scored separately and never blended into one number. Risk is concentrated, as it usually is: 7 of 50 files are git hotspots, and they average 3.9 — which is where the fixes pay off most.

Full health report

Documentation39pages

0 with model-written prose, 39 built from the index Score validation16/202.0× baselineTop-ranked files that did go on to need a bug fix Dead code2exportsUnused exports that nothing in the graph reaches

Do next

0 suggested

Nothing stands out in the week to Aug 29, the last indexed commit.

Improve what Repowise can see

Add a test coverage report
Without one, Repowise cannot tell tested code from untested code, so every test-related action says “unknown”.
line coverage
Unknown, no report
Small effort