Every commit scored for change-risk against this repo's own history, so 'elevated' means elevated here rather than on some global curve.
Needs review
5 commits sit in this repo's top risk tercile, which is 36% of the 14scored. The cut is drawn against this codebase's own history rather than a global curve, so a quiet repo still fills its top band, and here it starts at 6.1 out of 10. What pushes a commit up is size and spread together: a large change confined to one area scores below a smaller one scattered across a dozen files.
Commit categories over time, read off the subject line. Fixes carry the accent because that is the series this chart exists to show.
How this repo's commit mix shifts over time.
Ranked by change-risk, highest first. Priority is a tercile of this repo's own distribution, so a quiet repo still fills its top band.
| # | Commit | Author | When | Lines | Risk | Top driver |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1d349a11Add files via upload | Fabian Seitz | 9y ago | +435 -0 | 96%Elevated | more lines added than baseline |
| 2 | 5f2cffc5Add files via upload | Fabian Seitz | 9y ago | +370 -0 | 89%Elevated | more lines added than baseline |
| 3 | 83cab2aaAdd files via upload | Fabian Seitz | 9y ago | +273 -0 | 82%Elevated | more lines added than baseline |
| 4 | f41854caUpdated Readme | Fabian Seitz | 9y ago | +61 -1 | 75%Elevated | more lines added than baseline |
| 5 | 3cd4c36dUpdated Readme | Fabian Seitz | 9y ago | +35 -3 | 68%Elevated | more lines added than baseline |
| 6 | a4f0fa14Update README.md | Fabian Seitz | 9y ago | +6 -15 | 61%Typical | fewer lines added than baseline |
| 7 | e6c51171Update README.md | Fabian Seitz | 9y ago | +4 -2 | 54%Typical | fewer lines added than baseline |
| 8 | c7385738Initial commit | Fabian Seitz | 9y ago | +1 -0 | 46%Typical | fewer lines added than baseline |
| 9 | c6dbda1eUpdate PIN2Clipboard.prf.xml | Fabian Seitz | 9y ago | +1 -1 | 29%Below typical | fewer lines added than baseline |
| 10 | 2050c477Update PIN2Clipboard.prf.xml | Fabian Seitz | 9y ago | +1 -1 | 29%Below typical | fewer lines added than baseline |
| 11 | e9718a9dUpdated Readme again :D | Fabian Seitz | 9y ago | +1 -1 | 29%Below typical | fewer lines added than baseline |
| 12 | e88ebed4Updated Readme | Fabian Seitz | 9y ago | +1 -0 | 29%Below typical | fewer lines added than baseline |
| 13 | 68827abfRename Phone_Lost_GITHUB.prf.xml to Phone_Lost.prf.xml | Fabian Seitz | 9y ago | +0 -0 | 7%Below typical | fewer lines added than baseline |
| 14 | 0d9890bdUpdate README.md | Fabian Seitz | 9y ago | +0 -24 | 7%Below typical | fewer lines added than baseline |
Two views of the same model: where the cuts fall, and what commit shape lands you above them.
Every scored commit, binned on the raw 0 to 10 score rather than the percentile. Percentile ranks are uniform by construction, so that axis has no shape to draw. The dashed lines are the tercile cuts behind each row's priority pill.
The 14 most recent commits, on their own recency sample rather than the feed above: that defaults to risk-sorted, so reusing it would plot only the top tercile and call it the spread. Big and scattered is what the model penalises. Click a dot to open it.
FaserF/TaskerProfiles has 14 commits in its history from 1 contributor, the first of them Aug 21, 2017. Every commit is scored for change risk from its size, spread and the history of the files it touches.
