repowiserepowise
Sign in
FaserF/ha-moneymanager
OverviewDocsArchitectureKnowledge GraphFilesCode HealthRefactoring

People & History

CommitsContributorsDecisions
ChatPro
Stats
repowiserepowise
ExplorePricingDocs
Sign inIndex repoIndex your repo free
repowiseFaserF/ha-moneymanager
HA
HA

FaserF / ha-moneymanager

pythonmain14806d05.3K linessynced 21h ago

Code health

8.1out of 10Excellent

This codebase scores 8.1 out of 10 on defect risk, which we rate excellent. It also scores maintainability 8.1 and static performance risk 9.9 out of 10. The three are scored separately and never blended into one number. The files you change most are the weak spot: 3 of 47 files are git hotspots, and they average 5.1.

Full health report →
Documentation39pages0 with model-written prose, 39 built from the indexDead code4exportsUnused exports that nothing in the graph reaches
Lines of code
5.3K
Files
47
Symbols
269
Modules
3
Languages
6

Recent activity

All commits →

Commits

No commits indexed yet.

Decisions

  • Pre-populate sys.modules with mocked classes before importsproposed · 21h ago
  • Recursively mock Home Assistant submodules for sys.modules availabilityproposed · 21h ago
  • Preemptively mock Home Assistant modules to avoid test collection errorsproposed · 21h ago
  • Mock Home Assistant during tests when not installedproposed · 21h ago
  • Shim Unix-specific modules on Windows for test compatibilityproposed · 21h ago

Needs attention

19 open
  • medium severity. ProposedPre-populate sys.modules with mocked classes before importsAuto-proposed decision awaiting review
  • medium severity. ProposedRecursively mock Home Assistant submodules for sys.modules availabilityAuto-proposed decision awaiting review
  • medium severity. ProposedPreemptively mock Home Assistant modules to avoid test collection errorsAuto-proposed decision awaiting review
  • medium severity. ProposedMock Home Assistant during tests when not installedAuto-proposed decision awaiting review
  • medium severity. ProposedShim Unix-specific modules on Windows for test compatibilityAuto-proposed decision awaiting review

Where the risk concentrates

All 3 hotspots →

Ranked by prior bug fixes and change frequency, mined from full git history rather than from the code alone.

FileChurnPrior fixesMaintainersCommits 90d
calculate_release_details.py.github/scripts95.5th12bus factor 15
conftest.pytests86.4th023
release_helper.py.github/scripts77.3th11bus factor 13

Composition

Open the graph →
python 47%yaml 26%json 15%markdown 9%makefile 2%Other 2%

Explore this codebase

  • Docs39 pages across 3 modules→
  • ChatAsk this codebase a question and get an answer with its sources→
  • Files47 files with per-file docs, health and history→
  • ArchitectureDependency graph, layers, and 0 entry points→
  • Code healthPer-file scores, 115 open findings, coverage and refactoring targets→
  • Knowledge graphEntities, communities, and the paths between them→
  • Change couplingFiles that keep changing together, mined from commit history→
  • CommitsChange-risk ranked history with agent provenance→
  • ContributorsBus factor, per-file maintainers, and the human/agent split→
  • StatsSize class, origin, lifetime churn, rhythm and records→
  • CostsWhat indexing this snapshot cost, by model and by run→