repowiserepowise
Sign in
baneeishaque/ai-suite
OverviewDocsArchitectureKnowledge GraphFilesCode HealthRefactoring

People & History

CommitsContributorsDecisions
Chat
Stats
repowiserepowise
ExplorePricingDocs
Sign in
repowisebaneeishaque/ai-suite
AI
AI

baneeishaque / ai-suite

markdownmain55e5a3670.1K linessynced 1w ago
Since the previous index, 2w ago+9 files

Code health

9.6out of 10Excellent

This codebase scores 9.6 out of 10 on defect risk, which we rate excellent. It also scores maintainability 9.8 and static performance risk 9.8 out of 10. The three are scored separately and never blended into one number. The files you change most are the weak spot: 2 of 591 files are git hotspots, and they average 7.9.

Full health report →
Documentation203pages0 with model-written prose, 203 built from the indexScore validation1/204.93× baselineOf the 20 lowest-health files, 1 were bug-fixed in the last 6 months — 4.93× the 1% baselineDead code5exportsUnused exports that nothing in the graph reaches
Lines of code
70.1K
Files
591
Symbols
676
Modules
8
Languages
9

Recent activity

All commits →

Commits

No commits indexed yet.

Decisions

  • mariadb-check-autoincrement-trigger-fallbackproposed · 1w ago
  • add jsonl-content-extractor base skillproposed · 1w ago
  • extract blob-hash check into standalone scriptproposed · 1w ago
  • add equivalence-check and pair-walker primitives for commit comparisonsproposed · 1w ago
  • bootstrap onboarding coverage check from existing settings.jsonproposed · 1w ago
  • Retire indent-override layer; normalize to canonical 4-space JSONproposed · 1w ago

Needs attention

23 open
  • medium severity. Proposedmariadb-check-autoincrement-trigger-fallbackAuto-proposed decision awaiting review
  • medium severity. Proposedadd jsonl-content-extractor base skillAuto-proposed decision awaiting review
  • medium severity. Proposedextract blob-hash check into standalone scriptAuto-proposed decision awaiting review
  • medium severity. Proposedadd equivalence-check and pair-walker primitives for commit comparisonsAuto-proposed decision awaiting review
  • medium severity. Proposedbootstrap onboarding coverage check from existing settings.jsonAuto-proposed decision awaiting review

Where the risk concentrates

All 2 hotspots →

Ranked by prior bug fixes and change frequency, mined from full git history rather than from the code alone.

FileChurnPrior fixesMaintainersCommits 90d
run-brew-upgrade.py.agents/skills/brew-upgrade-workflow/scripts98.5th11bus factor 13
assemble-brew-command.py.agents/skills/brew-upgrade-command-assembly/scripts80.3th01bus factor 13

Composition

Open the graph →
markdown 74%python 20%shell 3%json 1%yaml 1%Other 2%

Explore this codebase

  • Docs203 pages across 8 modules→
  • ChatAsk this codebase a question and get an answer with its sources→
  • Files591 files with per-file docs, health and history→
  • ArchitectureDependency graph, layers, and 2 entry points→
  • Code healthPer-file scores, 609 open findings, coverage and refactoring targets→
  • Knowledge graphEntities, communities, and the paths between them→
  • Change couplingFiles that keep changing together, mined from commit history→
  • CommitsChange-risk ranked history with agent provenance→
  • ContributorsBus factor, per-file maintainers, and the human/agent split→
  • StatsSize class, origin, lifetime churn, rhythm and records→
  • CostsWhat indexing this snapshot cost, by model and by run→