fschutt/azul

fschutt / azul

rustmaster3e5ccbc979.5K linessynced 1mo ago

Code health

3.7out of 10At risk

This codebase scores 3.7 out of 10 for code health, which we rate at risk. It also scores maintainability 5.3 and static performance 9.8 out of 10. The three are scored separately and never blended into one number. Risk is concentrated, as it usually is: 314 of 1,814 files are git hotspots, and they average 2.7 — which is where the fixes pay off most.

Full health report

Documentation3,990pages

40 with model-written prose, 3,950 built from the index Score validation16/202.0× baselineTop-ranked files that did go on to need a bug fix Dead code76exportsUnused exports that nothing in the graph reaches

Do next

2 suggested

2 things worth doing this quarter.

Worth planning

Update the decision “Conservative jump-table range after exact ADR”: the code it governs has moved on
Agents and reviewers still follow it, so they are steered by a rule the code no longer keeps.
status
Accepted, drifting
Small effort, worth a check
Update the decision “Use cross-target cargo check as verification gate”: the code it governs has moved on
Agents and reviewers still follow it, so they are steered by a rule the code no longer keeps.
status
Accepted, drifting
Small effort, worth a check

Improve what Repowise can see

Add a test coverage report
Without one, Repowise cannot tell tested code from untested code, so every test-related action says “unknown”.
line coverage
Unknown, no report
Small effort