Every commit scored for change-risk against this repo's own history, so 'elevated' means elevated here rather than on some global curve.
Needs review
4 commits sit in this repo's top risk tercile, which is 31% of the 13scored. The cut is drawn against this codebase's own history rather than a global curve, so a quiet repo still fills its top band, and here it starts at 9.1 out of 10. What pushes a commit up is size and spread together: a large change confined to one area scores below a smaller one scattered across a dozen files.
Commit categories over time, read off the subject line. Fixes carry the accent because that is the series this chart exists to show.
Began other-led, now leaning feature.
Ranked by change-risk, highest first. Priority is a tercile of this repo's own distribution, so a quiet repo still fills its top band.
| # | Commit | Author | When | Lines | Risk | Top driver |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9f32b4acinitial commit | roshitx | 2y ago | +2.6K -0 | 96%Elevated | more lines added than baseline |
| 2 | aea3e876jest testing done, postman done. THANK GOD 😔 | roshitx | 2y ago | +1.5K -13 | 88%Elevated | more lines added than baseline |
| 3 | e2f081dcall done 2 | roshitx | 2y ago | +766 -991 | 81%Elevated | more lines added than baseline |
| 4 | 424adbd8add thread use case + testing, done | roshitx | 2y ago | +371 -0 | 73%Elevated | more lines added than baseline |
| 5 | 3c916c29thread repository postgres at infrastructure done | roshitx | 2y ago | +241 -3 | 65%Typical | more lines added than baseline |
| 6 | 22e2c053revisi 1 reviewer | roshitx | 2y ago | +136 -22 | 58%Typical | more lines added than baseline |
| 7 | 6fc39f1cadd ci action | roshitx | 2y ago | +41 -0 | 50%Typical | more lines added than baseline |
| 8 | 98281c30eslint: add logger to avoid console warning | roshitx | 2y ago | +47 -5 | 42%Typical | more lines added than baseline |
| 9 | df4cc289add cd action | roshitx | 2y ago | +25 -0 | 35%Typical | more lines added than baseline |
| 10 | bec11b7fadd say hello world test case | roshitx | 2y ago | +16 -0 | 27%Below typical | more lines added than baseline |
| 11 | 4492e67drevisi 2 reviewer | roshitx | 2y ago | +13 -81 | 19%Below typical | more scattered than baseline |
| 12 | ca32ebbdpass say hello world test case | roshitx | 2y ago | +8 -0 | 12%Below typical | fewer lines added than baseline |
| 13 | d1db4dd9ci/cd in progress | roshitx | 2y ago | +1 -0 | 4%Below typical | fewer lines added than baseline |
Two views of the same model: where the cuts fall, and what commit shape lands you above them.
Every scored commit, binned on the raw 0 to 10 score rather than the percentile. Percentile ranks are uniform by construction, so that axis has no shape to draw. The dashed lines are the tercile cuts behind each row's priority pill.
The 13 most recent commits, on their own recency sample rather than the feed above: that defaults to risk-sorted, so reusing it would plot only the top tercile and call it the spread. Big and scattered is what the model penalises. Click a dot to open it.
roshitx/forum-api has 14 commits in its history from 2 contributors, the first of them Sep 25, 2023. No file in the repository changed in the last 90 days. Every commit is scored for change risk from its size, spread and the history of the files it touches.
